Category:Debated Validations

Debated Validations are for what to put above "What made X heroic?". This gives all of the interpretable ideas of the said Fallen Hero having any redeeming moments to the slightest which could be the arguable overlapping moments for a said Fallen Hero. And the Debated Validations solely argue one things that the Fallen Hero did back then, now, or later on that dictates or implies otherwise that the said Fallen Hero isn't much of what they are due to some redeeming moment they have that makes them look like "Redeemed Villains" but is mostly a little arguable moment within the story that doesn't make their status as a Fallen Hero invalid.

Information pertaining to how arguably redeemable the Fallen Hero seems to be must be implemented for the Debated Validations. Similar to Near Pure Evil but in a way pertaining to anything along the lines of "X seems to have redeemed themselves or have redeemable traits through this information but another said information clearly clashes against the idea of X redeeming themselves" or "It remains unknown if X wants to redeem themselves or is being pragmatic due to said information and other said information. ".

The purpose of Debated Validations is to establish the known variety of potential redeeming moments that could be easily debunked or be unknown and not comfirmed enough to make said character redeemed or have some redeeming factors or migrating factors that makes the said Fallen Hero's status invalid.

Near Pure Evils all the way to Inconsistently Heinous MUST have Debated Validations on the very top as a 1 Subheading above "What made them heroic?" while for Pure Evil it must be under Trivia since Pure Evil's do not display Debated Validations on the very top because they mention who they are and how heinous they are and the Trivia saying "X has some debated validations" is where the Debated Validations go under for Pure Evil character's articles.